ALECOMM

Corruption Coverups in NSW Child Protection - Issue Five The NSW Office of the Privacy Commissioner and NSW Judicial System fabricates excuses for corruption in DoCS

Details

Category: NSW Ombudsman

Created: Monday, 22 October 2012 14:52

Written by Michael Hart

In Issue Four of Corruption Cover-Up’s, Alecomm noted how, even after having to prove in court that DoCS (Department of Human Services) have fabricated evidence during child abuse investigations, the NSW Ombudsman’s office refuses to investigate the corruption, and I quote “because the offenders won’t “fess up” to their crimes”.

In this issue we note that other oversight agencies also make up excuses for the corrupt conduct. So much so that the victim of the corruption has decided not to pursue the matter any further.

In this issue, we note that the victim of the corruption went to the NSW Judiciary to seek a proper outcome. That is a Proper Investigation into the Corruption, so the system could be more accountable, thus causing less adverse outcomes for children.

Even without legal assistance the victim was able to show that the evidence that DoCS fabricated about the victim was all false: ^{_{(Source : http://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/action/PJUDG?jgmtid=159144)}}

Despite this, just like the Ombudsman’s claim in Issue Three of Corruption Cover-ups, the “Child Protection Agencies involved in the JIRT investigation successfully argued that the services required for the protection, welfare and well-being of the children is not the basis of the decisions by the agencies”.

This is despite it being exactly what the statute claims.

 It was successfully argued by Agencies on the JIRT investigation that these services are someone else’s responsibility - so they were excused for falsifying information about them.

What made matters worse for the victim of the corruption, was that both the Presiding Judicial Officer in the Administrative Decisions Tribunal, and the NSW Deputy Privacy Commissioner fabricated excuses for the corruption.

Readers can see the response this got from the victim of the corruption and comment below on the victim’s distress.  ^{_{(Source : http://www.adt.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/and http://www.privacy.nsw.gov.au/)}}

The corruption and its cover-up has destroyed the victim’s family and the children’s future. As well, the Australian Judiciary and Oversight Systems’ continuing efforts to cover-up the corruption, has destroyed the victim’s recent relationship.

Alecomm views this as absolutely disgusting that the NSW Judicial System actually makes up excuses for the fraud and corruption in the NSW Child Protection System, and we would like your views.

We would like readers to comment on the situation of victims of corruption like this case. Is it up to the victim to expose corruption and have it addressed?

Or do victims of corruption have the right to their life and the oversight authorities be responsible for fixing the corruption in Child Protection do this instead of covering it up?

Do the readers agree with the victim’s claims that when the Judiciary allows DoCS to fabricate evidence about services, it places children’s lives at risk?

When DoCS lie children die?

Your feedback is appreciated.