VCAT J134/2011 – CERTIFICATE OF APPOINTMENT OF REPRESENTATIVES
- Details
- Category: Uncategorised
- Created: Sunday, 10 May 2020 01:32
- Written by Alecomm2
I have appointed the Honorable Mr Robert Clark MLA for Box Hill and Attorney-General for Victoria as my representative for the purposes of this hearing in VCAT scheduled for 2pm on Wednesday 30 January 2013.
I have sent written submissions to VCAT, including copies of my certificate letter appointing Mr Clark, my letters of instructions and requests to Mr Clark and background information including Media Releases and a substantial and damning Whistleblowing Memorandum from my previous lay-representative Mr Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka.
Mr Schorel-Hlavka (as a mark of respect nicknamed amongst lawyers as the “Policeman of Lawyers”)is under yet more collateral attack from my erstwhile prosecutor Mr Michael Keith McGarvie and his team of a dozen government-salaried-for-life-lawyers at his self-confessed policeman of less than 10% of the legal profession, the Legal Services Commissioner. There is quite some pathos and irony there as to one has the name, the salary, the powers and the resources and the other does the deeds. On account of this unlawful and quite obviously criminal and corrupt coercion Mr Schorel-Hlavka has been coerced by the State into not taking any part in or attendance at this bizarre scheduled hearing.
It would be so much better if Mr Michael Keith McGarvie complied with the 2008 and 2009 Supreme Court rulings I obtained from separate Supreme Court judges telling him he has the powers and duties to police 100% of the legal profession (and I would add, 0% of litigants such as myself and Mr Schorel-Hlavka). The latter of those rulings issued from the Supreme Court included the reprimand, “I can understand why Mr Johnson sued you [Legal Services Commissioner] and “No. You are not entitled to costs.”
That second judicial ruling came after I had exercised Occams’s Razor and sought to withdraw the Legal Services Commissioner from my multi-million dollars Supreme Court fraud and misconduct damages counterclaim naming the Legal Services Commissioner in early 2009, naively thinking that a government agency chief with a legal regulators responsibilities of public and professional office would abide by the 2008 rulings just issued from the Court?
How was I to know back then that even two sets of such Supreme Court rulings, coupled with a damning State Government Ombudsman 2009 Annual Report to Parliament would not be enough for the Legal Services Commissioner to get the message as to what his job is really about. Why would Michael Keith McGarvie the former CEO of the Supreme Court think that on appointment as Legal Services Commissioner he had to obey Supreme Court rulings? He could pay a visit to State Ombudsman Victoria George Brouwer and shut him up (successfully for 3 years now) from whistleblowing to Minister, to Parliament and Public about the corrupt Legal Services Commissioner. Comply with two sets of Supreme Court rulings? That would be good and proper government and clearly neither the bureaucrats at the Legal Services Commissioner’s entourage nor their fraternal buddies and workmates at the VCAT are having a bar of that.
Preambles aside, Mr Robert Clark MP is a busy man with his double-helping of Parliamentarian and Ministerial responsibilities. With all of this corruption and misconduct he inherited from his predecessor, political journey-man Robert Hulls (former National Part Member for the Federal Seat of Mt Isa) who wouldn’t be excessively busy?
Accordingly, I hereby appoint Mr K#### G#### and Mr D#### Haningan jointly and severally, as alternates to represent me in Mr Robert Clark MP’s shoes, should Mr Clark not appear at this hearing, within reasonable time after all enquiries and searches are made as per proper courtesy to locate the Minister responsible for VCAT and for LSC (and for a lot of other failed legal agencies and funding programs of government as well).
Both gentlemen, Mr G#### and Mr H#### having previously represented me in this vexatious, abusive, record and Constitution and law-breaking VCAT proceedings J134/2011, as village elders, responsible citizens and non-lawyers along side Mr Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka.
I ask that VCAT show Mr G#### and Mr H#### the same courtesies as VCAT would extend to Mr Robert Clark MP – and none of the criminal discourtesies or pitch forks shown to Mr Schorel-Hlavka and myself.
Mr G#### and Mr H#### are equipped with copies of my full 48 page and 29 pages of submissions, draft resignation forms (for Mr Jonathan Smithers, Mr John Bowman, and Mr Greg Garde), draft orders sought by me at this hearing, media releases and copies of my letters of instructions to Mr Robert Clark MP.
Nothing in this appointment of representatives constitutes any admission or acceptance by me of any Constitutional validity or legal existence for VCAT or the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act. I hold it self-evident on the structure, conduct and performance of the alleged VCAT and the alleged Act that they are unconstitutional. As a statement of law neither VCAT nor that Act exist. These are points that VCAT must of course put forward to a “judicial body” for determination before it can do anything beyond throwing out the whole criminal conspiracy against me as a failed criminal attack.
I repeat these overtures to legality, as per my requests to VCAT in the two sets of points 1 to 6 of my instruction letter today to Mr Robert Clark.
And above all I demand undertakings from VCAT and LSC bureaucrats present at this VCAT hearing that they will respect and abide and extend all whistleblower protections, at common law, under sweeping State and Federal Laws and as reproduced in the Whistleblowers Protection Act and the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act, to and as are the rights of Mr Schorel-Hlavka, myself and all others appearing to represent me and / or prepared to testify for me (including Mr Robert Clark MP and his Federal near-equivalent the former Federal Attorney-General Robert McClelland).
I look forward to reports at the end of today from Mr Clark, or from his alternates Mr G#### and Mr H#### that law and order has been restored to VCAT by throwing out this criminal conspiracy proceeding against me, by VCAT making the draft orders I have been submitting since the first week of October, including as to compensation to me for my costs (at the discounted rate and short-changed amount I specified way back in early October 2012) and that Messrs Smithers, Bowman and Garde have resigned from their VCAT and “judicial” positions pending Nuremberg-style investigations and prosecutions against you these gentleman and their peers.
There are many following up after whatever transpires in VCAT on this hearing, to see that these outcomes are achieved.
I ask you to put down the pitch forks and go quietly, go now, for your own and for everybody else’s good.
Yours sincerely
Harold James Johnson
