"Leading Senior Constable Rebecca Cook does not care about sending children to abusers"
- Details
- Category: Uncategorised
- Created: Thursday, 09 August 2012 12:48
- Written by Alecomm2
Can’t help you Ms Cook.
From: Rebecca Cook This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.]">[mailto:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.]
Sent: Thursday, 9 August 2012 12:40 PM
To: xxx
Subject: Re: DANIEL HASSEN & BRONWYN TOMBS
ATT: L. BALTIMORE
Thankyou for your response. Can you please confirm if you have been legally appointed as Guardian of the child, Daniel HASSAN, and if so, by whom and when?
Can you confirm if you have had face to face contact with Daniel HASSAN or his mother Bronwyn TOMBS, and if so, when /where? And can you supply me with any contact details for them, address, location, ph numbers?
I would also remind you of your obligation under S 67X of the Family Law Act 1975 Cwlth, which creates an offence for a person who prevents or hinders the taking of action by a person or persons authorised under a recovery order to search for a child and if they find the child take the child to a person named on the order.
Regards
Leading Senior Constable Rebecca COOK
Coffs Harbour Police
PH: 66520299
To: "'Rebecca Cook'" <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
From: "Public Enquiries at Alecomm" xxx
Date: 07/08/2012 01:53PM
Cc: xxx
Subject: DANIEL HASSEN & BRONWYN TOMBS
Dear Ms Cook,
I am the current Guardian Ad Litem for the below-mentioned child, who’s rights I am currently working very hard for. I do understand there were orders made, however they were made without determining all evidence, in particular all the evidence relating to the domestic violence by the father. Procedural fairness has neither been abided by or followed by any legal persons involved in the matter and as such the Form 4 to have the matter put on the Magellan List was refused.
I'm not sure exactly why this was done as it is most certainly not in the interest of either justice or the child, but what I am sure of is all the documented evidence of domestic violence by the father including statements by the court ordered psych whom has the father acknowledging he has been violent towards the other two boys. There are also affidavits by the sisters stating of domestic violence and rather cruel punishment by the father – which I am happy to supply to you should you be concerned to where you are trying to send this child.
Furthermore, the father has only in the past few years tried to enter the boys life – this boy is now ten years old and there is no bond – and the fact that the father went for sole custody after initially only ever applying for contact was done after the child refused to spend more time with him. The childs’ right, and forcing him to live with his father because he does not want to, is against international covenants which Australia is obligated to abide by, not to mention how many violations of the family law act there has already been. On the positive side it does seem there has been a minor change in the attitude of the magistrate dealing with the matter …
Right at the present time the mother and child have sought legal representation to have the matter appealed and the orders stayed. There was an appearance last week however the retained solicitor bungled the case and filed the wrong motion. The father wanted a recovery order initated for the mother and some other things but you honour declined and gave further time to have the matter sorted out. Your honour has also not given his reasons for judgement and I believe this to be that he would rather have the matter sorted out before he does as the orders that he made contained numerous errors of law. All this indicates that there is ample room being left to have the matter sorted out, so the police intervening in the matter will only complicate things more and traumatise the child more so than he has already been due to these vexatious proceedings.
We would love to assist your matter Ms Cook, however as we are aware that your performance measures are based on how many arrests you make etc, and not how much justice you get, any information I could supply would be futile to my clients case, and as such, that is where my ability to help you ends.
On another note, we are aware that the father drove to the vicinity in which our business is conducted and all my staff fear for reprisals should we have to meet this man face on given his incredibly violent history and we ask that you restrain him from further contact with our organisation or apply for a restraining order on our behalf.
Kind regards,
And thankyou for contacting us.
L. Baltimore
General Enquiries – Alecomm
Australian Legislative Ethics Commission
From: Rebecca Cook This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.]">[mailto:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.]
Sent: Wednesday, 1 August 2012 12:54 PM
To: xxx
Subject: Please Contact
To whom it may concern
I am in receipt of one of your articles that appears to relate to a current Police investigation involving Bronwyn TOMBS, her ex husband Lindsay HASSAN and their child, Daniel HASSAN.
If you have any knowledge with regards to Daniel or Bronwyn, please contact:
Coffs Harbour Police
6652 0299
Regards
Rebecca COOK
Senior Constable
Coffs Harbour
|
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ |
|
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ |
|
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ |
[attachment "image001.jpg" removed by Rebecca Cook/32292/Staff/NSWPolice]
|
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ |
