Legal Aid Care Panel Solicitors not worth a Pinch of Shit
- Details
- Category: Uncategorised
- Created: Thursday, 10 February 2011 08:28
- Written by Alecomm
How many times can Legal Aid paid solicitors stand by and watch their matters be adjourned? This is not in the best interest of the child, whether the solicitor is acting for the parents or the child, if the solicitor is going to make themselves unavailable for court cases then they are not capable of dealing with such important matters and must be stricken from the Legal Aid Care Panel, so as to ensure that good and hardworking solicitors can help those most vulnerable.
Solitors on the Care Panel on the Central Coast are nothing more than a disgrace, and for what its worth, are part of the biggest child trafficking ring in the world - working under the guise of child protection.
Solicitors we are aware of on the Care Panel for Legal Aid on the Central Coast NSW, means that Legal Aid NSW will pay for you to have these persons represent you or your children in Childrens Court cases. However if your chosen solicitor is NOT ON THE PANEL, well you can't have them. 3 out of 8 on the panel are complete flops, and constantly running around spouting off that they are going to court to claim defamation and slander against Alecomm.
Well here we sit, here we wait ... Meanwhile, Stephen Marks from Gorokan on the Care Panel falls asleep - so I guess he won't get around to filing a suit. Dennis Chapman (Care Panel also) likes to leave his clients without represenation and so I guess even if he does file a suit, he wont turn up on the day. And Joy Alleyne (Care Panel) is always too busy to be at court so we don't have to worry about her either.
Yes you guessed it, these guys are all from the Central Coast Care Panel from Legal Aid. If you don't like these guys you can only choose from another 5 solicitors to represent you. Not good odds for parents and children on the central coast to have a decent hearing now is it.
But guess what??? DoCS are allowed to get their solicitors from Sydney. But you are not. That's not discrimination now is it Legal Aid???
Comments
Everyone has a RIGHT to be REPRESENTED in our court system and more so where innocent children are at RISK of becoming State Wards.
This is called Social Justice.
Or do you TAXPAYER think the poor and unfortunate of our society should be thrown to the lions and left without any representation at all ?
If the work these Child Protection Solicitors do is not covered by Legal Aid does this justify unethical Legal Services?
Why should we have to spend our hard earned wages to defend ourselves against this tyranny?
Is that why people like yourself do such shabby jobs - because you dont think we deserve any better? What the governments doing is against the Law - ITS FINANCIAL ABUSE, amongst other things, and you, participating in this farce are A CO-CONSPIRATOR.
And re the case you say we were speaking about : That matter should not have been brought into the courts in the first place. Another case where DoCs DO NOT employ any actions except LITIGATION because they're too fucking lazy get to get off their fat arses and actually go out there and do their job(which, incidentally, keeps pigs like yourself in well paid child trafficking jobs).
And another thing : Was the PARENT consulted before to ask whether or not they wanted an adjournment? I doubt it. And maybe if the lawyer that took the case could have been bothered making themselves available and argued the case WHICH IS WHAT HE GETS PAID TO DO, she could have argued against the DoCS solicitor WHO HAD NOTHING ON THE PARENT IN THE FIRST PLACE proven by the fact that the child is going home.
Things like you seem to think you have the right to do a shabby job, or just stand there like a f*cking moron and never actually work for your client.
And I WOULD SAY IT IS DOUBLE DIPPING BECAUSE EVERY BODY THAT PARTICIPATES IN THIS CHILD STEALING RACQUET GET PAID EACH TIME THEY STAND BY AND HAPPILY let DoCS lawyers go for the most common phrase they know : ADJOURN, ADJOURN, ADJOURN.
Guess you are one of those solicitors in whom gag orders don't apply...
And Solicitors do not double dip. The case you are speaking about Ashamed Australian would be an adjournment matter and they would not have been paid by DoCS and Legal Aid do not pay as much as you seem to think they do. They do not cover alot of the work that is actually done by the solicitor.
Re: Recent Story, where a Legal Aid Lawyer represented a parent client AND DoCs on the same day regarding the same case and was paid by 1) DoCS 2) Legal Aid on behalf of the parent client.
Talk about CORRUPTION MALADMINISTRATI ON MALPRRACTICE or is it just a case of THE RICH GET RICHER on the backs of the poor.