ALECOMM

"The European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France."

Details

Category: Uncategorised

Created: Saturday, 11 February 2012 23:30

Written by May- Harriet Seppola

THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Norway 11.02.12.

COUNCIL OF EUROPE ,

67075 STRASBOURG CEDEX,

FRANCE

I am a member of an organization called “Protection of the norwegian families “

I have two children myselv and are well-known of rhe meaning of the biological principals .

“The childrens welfare” in Norway has 49800 children , they are “helping”.

Between 12000 and 13000 children has been removed from rheir parents by force and with help from the police , in a spesial case were there used armed guns againt a father while his 12 year old son was watching .

Ole Texmo, leader for “Forum for men and caring”:

are writing in one of his articles

“Respect for the biological ties between parents and children are at a low point among professionals, which many parents more than less voluntary came into contact with the child has been painfully .

The acts scheme allegedly suggets that first and foemost , trying out new ways in which the mainlence of family are respected , and return of custody to the biological family systematically emphasized is agross insult to large member of parents and children , who have had their lives ruined by professionals with a swiched wievs on th eimportance of family ties.

The beforementioned professionals statement is all the more grotesque in their perspective.

It appears to go far in this contempt , is assiate Proffessor Reidun Follesøe that spoke to the biological principle “Clean it out”.

To understand how and why the child protection act as it does - in a variety of individual cases, but also in media contexts where one is free to propagandize for the inhuman attitude - it is important to be aware of the thinking that lies at the heart of the child welfare ideology. Psychologist Katrin Koch is responsible for the psychological association's buck-and oat bag training of experts has on several occasions spoken out negatively about the biological ties. The really ironic thing is that psychologists do not understand the harm caused to children by the most basic bands worn over and destroyed. The professionals do not understand the destructive role they have, unfortunately, no mystery. In addition, professionals brazen enough to claim that biological ties are too strong. In its structure not unlike the allegations that the system hold unprotected access rights is too strong legal and "political

Several researchers have written about the harmful effects of children being removed from their biological parents, among other things, the English psychiatrist John Bowlby, who wrote about children's feelings when they were removed from their biological parents and other family:

Children who lost their parents by death, tackled this easier than when they were removed by force from his family and he proved that this was the cause of psychological problems later in life, and that this had very serious consequences for a child's personality development.

Child welfare and children's academic experts have always shown a remarkable lack of interest in this.

Child welfare and children's academic experts have always shown a remarkable lack of interest in this.

Psychiatrist Earl Jølstad wrote an article as early as 2002 in "Suicidologi" No. 1 on patients who suffered from depression and suicidal tendencies strong that it was rooted in that children were deprived of their parents, even if the location is off the short-lived.

 Children who lose their parents, grandparents, his family clan, the home and playmates, all that gives them continuity in their lives, can not bear this grief alone without the help of his own family.Child Welfare and other employees have made up a large and collective life-lie as they maintain that children are better of being moved "from one of their eyes bad home" and long placed in a "well-functioning foster care."

They continue their life-lie by deliberately weakening the companionship between parents and children in the ridiculous belief that children forget their parents.

There is no research on how children experience the separation.

This life-lie is shared by many psychologists and psychiatrists in the child welfare area, the Ministry and the perception of NOVA.

The Swedish researcher Winner Bo Ljung has written a treatise on his own experiences in this area and came to the conclusion that children coped better "a so-called bad home environment" rather than be moved to the complete strangers. To inflict such terrible children experience loss and grief as the removal from one home and placement in foster care until strangers, involves such great trauma for any child that it should not be performed except in extreme cases and when should a large family of children line up.The worst thing is that when the foster parents, child welfare institutions and see that these removed children mourn their lost family makes the problem worse and make the diagnosis of these children with ADHD, supply them with Ritalin and make a fatal damage.

Until now it has paid a great deal compensation to children who have been sexually and mentally abused in orphanages, foster homes and institutions and will therefore Magne Raundalen support of the barns that nothing in care and the proportion of injured children is getting bigger and bigger. 

Biological parents are deprived of all rights in society and legal system is of such nature that svœrt few parents win back their children.

Child Welfare acts as the Dr. Mengele & co visits to private homes:

Otherwise, will the Norwegian Ministry of Children and Family Affairs to use 3-4 million to propagandize for foster care, as they have come short of them (hopefully, because decent people are starting to wake up and understand that they must register as henchmen for an organization which is out of all ethical control, a regime that has evolved into a pure tortfeasor). More than I remember hints proverbial meeting where the SS planned the organization of the "Final Solution"? Norwegian child regularly holds such strategy meetings, they called "seminars", "conferences" and "continuing education courses."

Now, the abuse of Travellers extended to the general population. As in the Soviet Union under Stalin, anyone can, at random, subjected to house searches, interrogations and years of persistent surveillance, forced "treatment" for non-existing mental illness, and of course the deportation of the children. But it is to pass to us that society is destroyed in this way, we have let it happen to Travellers. We Norwegians are simply not very freedom-loving, we are fascinated and pigs bind the authority and indoctrination just as others, such as large parts of the German people who could not or would not, believe in "concentration camps.

The biological principle is strong in Norwegian children's rights and this principle means both that they are the biological parents should be responsible for their children's upbringing and that there is a high intrinsic value for the child to grow up with their biological parents.

Social Law Commission stated that "It is a fundamental principle in our society that parents themselves provide for their children. Although detected failures of the parents in their relationship to the children - perhaps a problem of a serious nature - is the starting point, therefore, that the problems should be sought primœrt improved through measures "

A unanimous parliamentary committee emphasized that it is important that the child protection measures must be implemented for the child's part, not be designed in a way that unnecessarily break ties between children and biological parents.

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

^ Top

Article 2.

• Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

^ Top

Article 3.

• Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

^ Top

Article 4.

• No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

^ Top

Article 5.

• No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or “punishment.”:http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/

• The norwegian government will remove the biological principles abn will continue in breaking laws in Norway.

• Reversal will basically happen when parents largely on chance can give the child proper care. Although parents with time can give the child proper care, the reversal is denied if the child has established such a connection to the new environment that can cause serious problems for the child if it is moved. The Committee believes that this assessment should take place more frequently and suggests that it should be mandatory for the county board to make it when

Brian Gerrish has worked against the children welfare in England and this is what he has “found”:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBwGEp-57ig

Russian media has written more about childrens care in Norway than norwegian media “

You will never see your mother again," officers of Norwegian child protection agencies (barnevern) told a 13-year-old boy when they were taking him away from his home. The boy is currently living with a foster family. His biggest dream now is to get back to his mother as soon as possible. Seeking help, the boy wrote several emails to the Russian embassy, in which he told his story.

Pravda.Ru has published several articles about the fate of Irina Bergseth (maiden name Frolova), a Norway-based Russian citizen. The woman accused her Norwegian husband of committing sex crimes against their common four-year-old son.

Local social services took the woman's two children away from her. The younger son, Misha, a citizen of Norway, was delivered to his father. The elder son, Sasha, 13, a Russian citizen, was settled in a foster “family”:http://english.pravda.ru/society/stories/07-07-2011/118418-norway_children-0/

Vitaly could do only one thing: he could struggle for his child at court. This turned out to be a huge problem as well. In accordance with Norwegian laws, he, being an unemployed individual, had the right for a free lawyer. However, it was the child protection services that were paying for the lawyer's services.

As a result, the court rulings were unpredictable. "They were saying things like "the court thinks, the court believes." They were not making any references to the law. Still they ruled that the father was unable to give his child enough love and support," Vitaly said.

As a result, the Norwegian authorities decided to stop the man with the help of a well-known principle: no man, no problem. They decided to deport Vitaly from the country. The Russian Consulate Office refused to accept the man back without the child.

The man was jailed for alleged attempt to kidnap his child and for his illegal stay in Norway.

Vitaly spent one year in jail. He has been released recently, but he is not going to give up. The man was allowed to see his son four times a year, for two hours per meeting. The boy can hardly remember his father now. He does not even speak Russian anymore. He was adopted by his teacher, Leena, whose name he was mentioning so often “before.”:http://english.pravda.ru/society/stories/11-10-2011/119296-norway_children-1/

In accordance with the laws of Norway, any child, who lives in the country, is protected by the state. It is the state that can decide whether a child shall live with biological or foster parents. The decisions taken by local child protection services are more relevant that judges' “decisions.”:http://english.pravda.ru/society/stories/12-08-2011/118735-norway-0/