fbpx

"Tas Attorney General Brian Wightman and Magistrate Mark Brett in Hot Seat for Destroying Records of Court and Public Office"

Details
Category: Corrupt Magistrates and Judges
Created: Friday, 16 December 2011 11:03
Written by Alecomm2

brianwightman2Brian Wightman, a gentleman, with his whole life in front of him, is now in the HOT SEAT due to incidents in the Court of Petty Sessions at Devonport on Friday the 9th of December, 2011 when Constable Steven Andrew Jones tried to prosecute Mark Elvin Sharman for "Assaulting Stephen Craig Karpeles a Public Officer in the execution of his duty by hitting him in the chest and shoulder area with his chest", under section 34B of the Police Offences Act 1935 that carries "a penalty not exceeding 25 penalty units or (-) imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months" ... something which Mr Elvin strongly denies.

Read more ... 1 comment

"Crimes Act 1900 No 40 Part 4B - Section 249K - Blackmail Offence "

Details
Category: Legislation and Acts
Created: Wednesday, 11 January 2012 11:55
Written by Alecomm2

EASTERN SYDNEY CSC

Crimes Act 1900 No 40 Part 4B - Section 249K - Blackmail Offence

(1) A person who makes any unwarranted demand with menaces:

(a) with the intention of obtaining a gain or of causing a loss, or

(b) with the intention of influencing the exercise of a public duty, is guilty of an offence.

Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.

(2) A person is guilty of an offence against this subsection if the person commits an offence against subsection (1) by an accusation, or a threatened accusation, that a person has committed a serious indictable offence.

Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 14 years.

Add new comment

"How Do We Get Rid of Corrupt Judges and Magistrates"

Details
Category: Corrupt Magistrates and Judges
Created: Friday, 27 January 2012 18:26
Written by Alecomm2
.. So if we start petitioning a decent councillor to put forward the motion on a couple of crappy judges with some good hard evidence, and there is a lot of it floating around, we may just be able to get the Parliamentarians to "pray" for such removal.  What I am wondering though is why in bloody hell do they have to "pray" and not just stand up and say "I" or something.  Can you imagine the whole of parliament really sitting there praying, i mean seriously.  And what about the islamic parliamentarians, will we have to provide blankets so they can get down on their hands and knees to do it also?
 
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
Read more ... Add new comment

"WA DCP - Children and Community Services Act 2004"

Details
Category: Legislation and Acts
Created: Tuesday, 07 February 2012 10:01
Written by Alecomm2 
TABLE OF PROVISIONS

   PART 1 -- Preliminary  

   1.      Short title  
   2.      Commencement  
   3.      Terms used  
   4.      Presumptions of parentage  
   5.      Status of notes

   PART 2 -- Objects and principles

           Division 1 -- Objects  

   6.      Objects

           Division 2 -- General principles relating to children  

   7.      Best interests of child are paramount consideration  
   8.      Determining the best interests of a child  
   9.      Principles to be observed  
   10.     Principle of child participation
Read more ... Add new comment

"Crimes Act 1900 - Section 546A - Consorting with Convicted Persons"

Details
Category: Legislation and Acts
Created: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 14:28
Written by Alecomm2

(1) Any person who habitually consorts with persons who have been convicted of indictable offences, if he or she knows that the persons have been convicted of indictable offences, shall be liable on conviction before the Local Court to imprisonment for 6 months, or to a fine of 4 penalty units.

(2) Proceedings for an offence against this section may be commenced at any time within 12 months after the date of commission of the offence.

(Source : http://corrigan.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/ca190082/s546a.html)

1 comment

"Crimes Act 1900 - Section 545C - Knowingly Joining or Cointinuing in Etc an Unlawful Assembly"

Details
Category: Legislation and Acts
Created: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 14:33
Written by Alecomm2

unlawful combatants(1) Whosoever knowingly joins an unlawful assembly or continues in it shall be taken to be a member of that assembly, and shall, on conviction before the Local Court, be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding 5 penalty units, or both. (2) Whosoever being armed with any weapon or loaded arms, or with anything which used as a weapon of offence is likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm, is a member of an unlawful assembly, shall be liable, on conviction before the Local Court, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding twelve months or to a fine not exceeding 10 penalty units, or both. (3) Any assembly of five or more persons whose common object is by means of intimidation or injury to compel any person to do what the person is not legally bound to do or to abstain from doing what the person is legally entitled to do, shall be deemed to be an unlawful assembly.

Source : http://corrigan.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/ca190082/s545c.html)

Add new comment

"Crimes Act 1900 - Section 545B - Intimidation or Annoyance by Violence or Otherwise"

Details
Category: Legislation and Acts
Created: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 14:41
Written by Alecomm2

(1) Whosoever:

(a) with a view to compel any other person to abstain from doing or to do any act which such other person has a legal right to do or abstain from doing, or

(b) in consequence of such other person having done any act which he had a legal right to do, or of his having abstained from doing any act which he had a legal right to abstain from doing,

wrongfully and without legal authority:

(i) uses violence or intimidation to or toward such other person or his wife, child, or dependant, or does any injury to him or to his wife, child, or dependant, or

(ii) follows such other person about from place to place, or

(iii) hides any tools, clothes, or other property owned or used by such other person, or deprives him of or hinders him in the use thereof, or

(v) follows such other person with two or more other persons in a disorderly manner in or through any street, road, or public place,

is liable, on conviction before the Local Court, to imprisonment for 2 years, or to a fine of 50 penalty units, or both.

(2) In this section:
"Intimidation" means the causing of a reasonable apprehension of injury to a person or to any member of his family or to any of his dependants, or of violence or damage to any person or property, and "intimidate" has a corresponding meaning.
"Injury" includes any injury to a person in respect of his property, business, occupation, employment, or other source of income, and also includes any actionable wrong of any nature.

(Source : http://corrigan.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/ca190082/s545b.html)

Add new comment

"Crimes Act 1900 - Section 351B - Aiders and Abettors Punishable as Principals"

Details
Category: Legislation and Acts
Created: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 14:55
Written by Alecomm2

(1) Every person who aids, abets, counsels or procures the commission of any offence punishable on summary conviction may be proceeded against and convicted together with or before or after the conviction of the principal offender.

(2) On conviction any such person is liable to the penalty and punishment to which the person would have been liable had the person been the principal offender.

(3) This section applies to offences committed before or after the commencement of this section.

(4) This section applies to an indictable offence that is being dealt with summarily.

Add new comment

"Coffs Harbour Family Courts, ICLs and Court Reporters - Coincidental Stuff Ups or Collusion on a Big Scale?"

Details
Category: Corrupt Magistrates and Judges
Created: Wednesday, 13 June 2012 19:16
Written by Alecomm2

If you are lucky enough, and female, to get Judge Jarret - don't bother going to court!  Just run.  Pack up the family at the first sign of issues or court paperwork, and get the hell out of there.

This magistrate a few years ago sent a beautiful young girl to live with her father - after she disclosed to her mother what her daddy had been doing --- dont think this is a case of mother punishing father by lying - the mother and father had already split and the mother already gave the father liberal contact.

After taking the matter to the police and reporting it, the young girl - was taken to Bravehearts for counselling - in which she did disclose and is now documented, her sexual abuse by her father.  The young girl was said to be doing well.  She had not seen her father in over twelve months, the nightmares were stopping, though the police still hadn't investigated the matter enough to file charges.

Read more ... Add new comment

"Crown solicitor for DoCS, Michelle England caught breaking the law again!"

Details
Category: Michelle England - Crown Solicitor
Created: Monday, 13 August 2012 10:35
Written by Alecomm2

Congratulations Michelle England for being today's winner on Sydney Lawyers Asshole of the Day!  You have been nominated several times for the award, and after a fantastic performance in the Supreme Court last week, you have won this amazing opportunity!

First of all, we would like to tell you a little bit about our contestant Michelle.  She successfully argued her matter first in the Supreme Court in Sydney before Judge Balls as the Respondent.  A fantastic win, and she almost won another case also in the Supreme Court that wasn't even being argued that day!  Talk about saving the tax-payers money Michelle, what a fine legal example you are.

Then [she] successfully won a case against a grandmother fighting to have contact with her grandchild in the care of the "System", after being allowed to argue that the grandmother - who is also in a wheelchair - was not a suitable person to be having contact with her grandchild because she attended a protest.  Great going Michelle, you're certainly setting the style for ethical legal arguments in the NSW Courts.

Read more ... 1 comment

"Cartel Provisions - Competition and Consumer Act 2010 - Section 44ZZRD "

Details
Category: Legislation and Acts
Created: Monday, 04 February 2013 10:47
Written by Alecomm2

cartel3 467b2COMPETITION AND CONSUMER ACT 2010 - SECT 44ZZRD

Cartel provisions

             (1)  For the purposes of this Act, a provision of a contract, arrangement or understanding is a cartel provision if:

                     (a)  either of the following conditions is satisfied in relation to the provision:

                              (i)  the purpose/effect condition set out in subsection (2);

                             (ii)  the purpose condition set out in subsection (3); and

                     (b)  the competition condition set out in subsection (4) is satisfied in relation to the provision.

Purpose/effect condition

             (2)  The purpose/effect condition is satisfied if the provision has the purpose, or has or is likely to have the effect, of directly or indirectly:

                     (a)  fixing, controlling or maintaining; or

                     (b)  providing for the fixing, controlling or maintaining of;

Read more ... Add new comment

"Cartel Provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 - Section 44zrd"

Details
Category: Legislation and Acts
Created: Monday, 04 February 2013 10:57
Written by Alecomm2

cartel3 467b2COMPETITION AND CONSUMER ACT 2010 - SECT 44ZZRD

Cartel provisions

             (1)  For the purposes of this Act, a provision of a contract, arrangement or understanding is a cartel provision if:

                     (a)  either of the following conditions is satisfied in relation to the provision:

                              (i)  the purpose/effect condition set out in subsection (2);

                             (ii)  the purpose condition set out in subsection (3); and

                     (b)  the competition condition set out in subsection (4) is satisfied in relation to the provision.

Purpose/effect condition

             (2)  The purpose/effect condition is satisfied if the provision has the purpose, or has or is likely to have the effect, of directly or indirectly:

                     (a)  fixing, controlling or maintaining; or

                     (b)  providing for the fixing, controlling or maintaining of;

Read more ... Add new comment

More Articles ...

  1. "Surveillance Devices Act 2007 - Section 11 Prohibition on Communication or Publication of Private Conversations or Recordings of Activities"
  2. " Crimes Act 1900 No 40 - Section 545B- Intimidation or annoyance by violence or otherwise"
  3. "Crimes Act 1900 No 40 - Section 249M - Menaces"
  4. "DoCS solicitor John Meehan blames mother over sexual assault of daughter, instead of predator-father"
  5. "Is John Meehan accusing Alecomm of being a terrorist organisation ?"
  6. "Calls for resignation of DHS legal representative, as debate fires up over Meehans' multiple conflicts of intererest"
  7. "Dennis Chapman attacks CAP members supporting parents in Children's Court"
  8. "Corruption in the High court of Australia revealed"
  9. "Lawyers of the Week"

Subcategories

  • Case Law
    Article Count:
    1
  • Judicial Corruption
    Article Count:
    43
  • Lawyers and Solicitors
    Article Count:
    21
  • Law Reform
    Article Count:
    2
  • Legal Aid
    Article Count:
    1
  • Legislation and Acts

    We intend on using almost one dozen different legislation / acts. Below are a few that we feel would have the most impact for class action causes and or entry to Australian Crime Commission help.  What we need to be able to utilise the legislations is more than one person claiming the same type of offence, and by different departments and different areas.  This can show mass conspiracies so to speak which would then be covered by the National Crime Act.

    We also plan to use Crimes (Hostages) Act 1900 as this act allows for persons being held hostage (ie our children) until we agree to submit to persons to what they ask.  This is keeping a hostage, and by DOCs taking your children and not returning them until you have signed undertakings is not only hostage taking but blackmail. 

    There is no such thing as CONsent Orders.  You cannot possibly say anybody voluntarily signs these orders when the department has their children and will not return them until the orders are signed.  These are not Consent Orders.  This is Blackmail.

    When crimes total to over 3 years imprisonment which we can make an easy jump to, they are then also available to go to the National Crimes Act.

    We also plan on using the Director General as DOCs legislation and code of conduct and ethics documentation available also shows that any crime committed against these acts MUST be reported to the director general.  And as such the director general also has an obligation to report fraud and misconduct to the Attorney General and the Australian Crimes Commission.

    We will use the evidence we have to submit to lower level figures about their staff and they are then obligated to submit the complaint (by legislation) to the director general.  If they do not do this, they are then setting themselves up for charges also.  We will know if this is done because not only will we be submitting this information / complaints this way, but we will also be submitting directly to the director general also, who ALSO is under obligation to send to the Australian Crime Commsision and the Independant Commission Against Corruption.

    So, you say ... What do you need to do now ??

    You need to gather all your documents and evidence and start splitting hairs and complaints down to division / person and complaint type using the register we are currently creating.  You also need to contact me for other complaint types that we are not aware of so that we can include this also.

    This may take some time but time is all we have and the more the better.

    Article Count:
    69
  • SLAPP - Strategic lawsuit against public participation
    Article Count:
    2